Edit - Reported again, got instant response. Kishimoto is still getting ripped off, but I am not.

dA, it's been nearly a week, with no apparent response to reports. Is there a good reason why you're letting an eyeballer continue to offer a recreation of MY art as a PRINT?

Original:

[link]

Offender:

[link]

Not to mention it's a COPYRIGHTED character by Nintendo. Precisely why I never offer fanart as prints. And, you know, categorize it correctly.

Yet this one has a gallery full of eyeballed Naruto work, and offers them all as prints.

Has this place seriously sunk to the depths of Sheezyart?

Reproduction of Existing Works by Any Method
Situations listed under the heading of Not Tolerated will override the situations listed under Usually Tolerated

# Not Tolerated

• The reproduction exactly duplicates an original work and the owner of the original work files a complaint. - check
• Reproduction is misrepresented as being something other than a copy of an existing work. - check
• The reproduction targets a stock resource and violates one or more of the Terms and Conditions for use of that stock. - n/a
• The reproduction actually contains elements of the original (i.e. photo showing through paintover). - n/a

# Sometimes Tolerated

• The reproduction contains new elements which show a departure from the original. - Haha, no.
• The reproduction obviously copies an existing work but possesses noticeable and substantial differences. - Nope.
• The reproduction obviously copies an existing work but is noticeably deficient in quality. - Because letting kids not learn to draw on their own is cruise control for cool!
• The reproduction and the original bare only vague or broad resemblances to each other (i.e. poses, etc). - Nope.
• The reproduction has been posted into a Fan Art Gallery. - Haha, not even that.
• The reproduction has been posted into the Scrapbook area. - Nope.
• The reproduction targets an element of pop culture (i.e. Anime screenshots or official video game content). - Nope.
• The reproduction properly credits the original. - No, no....he is a "sight drawer", and therefore, that makes it okay. 9_6